Sexual aids and rubber dolls play a much more complex role than we might assume at first glance. Objects are far from being present only through their function, and they are far from merely playing the role of a tool in cultural use. A sexual device displayed in the still life genre makes its object more understandable, but if I depict it on its own, highlight it, I present it to the viewer as a work of art. These groups of objects are copies of the human body and body parts, so by taking them out, I can confront the viewer with the objectification of ourselves. Sex dolls depicted in the still life genre are easier to interpret for the viewer. The still life is something that appeals not only to the viewer accustomed to high art, but also to the casual visitor. My questions appear in my pictures in a primary way, not hidden, formulated in an easy-to-understand language, so that I can speak to as many people as possible. Human relationships are becoming more and more complicated, and nowadays it is difficult to maintain quality emotional contacts. But when we hear that someone is in love with an object, it makes the situation even more complicated and surreal. My solution to understanding this is a more distanced art research in which different techniques can provide answers. The technique I use always depends on the question I want to show. If my investigation is from a historical point of view and the focus is more on research, then I feel the black-and-white visual is appropriate, as it is more documentary and distant. I think that it helps to interpret the topic and bring it closer if I depict the individual questions in a variety of genres and techniques. In my creations, I aim for interpretation and understanding, so it is not the eye and the soul that awaits the recipient. Today’s crisis of beauty lies precisely in the fact that beauty has been reduced to its availability, use and consumption value.
